Enrich

Legal

Data with Advanced AI

Extract obligations, flag high-risk clauses, and draft remediation language from your contract text.
Risk hides in the redlines.
NiftyBot extracts obligations, flags high-risk clauses, and drafts remediation language from your contract text. Lawyers focus on judgment calls, not copy-paste.
Complexity: Medium
Contract Risk Extractor
Speed matters in legal review. This call spots indemnity and data-handling risk in a Microsoft-style MSA and proposes safer language. Counsel gets a head start on negotiation positions.
REQUEST

{ "source": { "counterparty": "Microsoft", "document_type": "Master Services Agreement", "clauses": { "indemnity": "Provider indemnifies Customer for third-party IP claims…", "data_processing": "Provider may transfer data globally subject to adequate protections…", "limitation_of_liability": "Liability cap equals fees paid in the 12 months preceding the claim…" } }, "requests": [ { "field_name": "risk_flags" }, { "field_name": "suggested_revisions" } ] }
RESPONSE

{ "enrichments": [ { "field_name": "risk_flags", "value": ["Broad IP indemnity scope", "Ambiguous cross-border transfer safeguards", "Low liability cap for enterprise risk"], "confidence": 0.83, "method": "assessment", "reasoning": "Language expands provider exposure and weakens data transfer clarity; cap may not reflect potential damages." }, { "field_name": "suggested_revisions", "value": ["Limit indemnity to third-party claims alleging direct infringement", "Reference SCCs and specify transfer mechanisms", "Raise cap to 2x annual fees or carve-out for data breaches"], "confidence": 0.78, "method": "reasoning", "reasoning": "Edits align with common enterprise guardrails while preserving deal momentum." } ] }
Complexity: High
Litigation Watchlist
Surprises belong in launches, not litigation. This call compiles major case themes for Tesla and the practical implications for procurement clauses. Legal and sourcing teams get ahead of risk.
REQUEST

{ "source": { "company": "Tesla", "jurisdictions": ["US Federal", "California State"], "time_window_months": 12 }, "requests": [ { "field_name": "top_themes" }, { "field_name": "procurement_implications" } ] }
RESPONSE

{ "enrichments": [ { "field_name": "top_themes", "value": ["Product liability allegations", "Labor and workplace claims", "Regulatory investigations"], "confidence": 0.74, "method": "assessment", "reasoning": "Themes reflect widely reported litigation categories within the stated window." }, { "field_name": "procurement_implications", "value": ["Tighten warranty language and remedy timelines", "Include audit rights for safety-related obligations", "Escalation clauses for regulatory notices"], "confidence": 0.72, "method": "reasoning", "reasoning": "Clauses mitigate exposure when counterparties face recurring litigation themes." } ] }